Choosing Chemical Resistant Gloves
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) addresses the need for hand protection in 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1910.138:
- 1910.138(a) “General requirements. Employers shall select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands are exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.”
- 1910.138(b) “Selection. Employers shall base the selection of the appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the task(s) to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified.”
Employers must match the right glove with each application or task. The selection of proper chemical-resistant gloves begins with a hazard assessment. Factors that influence the glove selected include:
- Chemical(s) being handled
- Concentration of the chemical(s)
- Temperature of the chemical(s)
- Frequency and duration of contact with the chemical(s)
- Nature of contact – total immersion or splash only
- Length to be protected – hand, forearm, arm
- Dexterity required
- Grip requirements
- Size and comfort requirements
The key factor for determining what glove material is best suited for a given application is the chemical being used. A Safety Data Sheet (SDS) is the first and usually best place to find a suggestion for which glove material is appropriate. If that information is not on the SDS, then refer to the glove manufacturers’ chemical resistance guides and select the glove with the best rating for the anticipated exposure.
The glove manufacturers’ test data is generally from a laboratory environment and with one specific chemical. Glove manufacturers generally do not test chemical mixtures and don't consider other variables, such as hot or cold temperatures and cut hazards. Links to the interactive software and/or chemical resistance guides from a variety of Grainger suppliers are given below:
On these chemical resistance guides, you will find references to gloves made from many different materials. Different glove materials react differently to individual chemicals and the chemical compatibility of a given material can and does vary from glove manufacturer to glove manufacturer. Glove selection must be based on the given manufacturer’s test data.
Gloves are generally tested and rated in three categories for chemical compatibility: degradation, breakthrough time and permeation rate. All three should be considered when selecting a glove.
Degradation is a change in physical properties of the glove material. Common effects include swelling, wrinkling, stiffness, change in color or other physical deterioration. The degradation ratings indicate how well a glove will hold up when working with a specific chemical. Degradation tests vary by manufacturer. There is no standardized test that is used by everyone in the industry. However, the glove material usually has constant exposure to the test chemical and the percent weight change is then determined at time intervals. Degradation is usually the first test conducted. Most manufacturers do not test permeation or breakthrough time if the chemical causes significant degradation to the glove material. Degradation alone can be enough to disqualify a glove for use with a chemical.
Breakthrough time is the elapsed time between initial contact of the chemical on one side of the glove material and the analytical detection of the chemical on the other side of the glove material. This test is conducted per the ASTM F739 Standard Test Method for Permeation of Liquids and Gases through Protective Clothing Materials under Conditions of Continuous Contact. The higher the result, the longer it takes for the chemical to pass through the glove material. The actual time reported on the chemical is usually listed on the resistance charts. If breakthrough did not occur, the data reported is typically None Detected (ND) or > (greater than) the indicated test period. The times generally reflect how long a glove can be expected to provide resistance when totally submerged in the test chemical.
Permeation rate is a measurement that describes the rate of the chemical passing through the glove material at the molecular level. This process is similar to how a balloon loses air after enough time passes even though it is still tied and has no visible holes. The thickness of the glove can greatly affect the permeation rate. Manufacturers report permeation rate in different ways. Some report in micrograms of chemical per square centimeter of glove material per minute. The higher the result, the more chemical passing through the glove material. Other manufacturers rate the permeation similar to that done for degradation: excellent (E), good (G), fair (F), poor (P) and not recommended (NR). If chemical breakthrough does not occur, permeation is not measured. This is reported as ND or not tested (NT) depending upon the manufacturer. This test is also conducted per ASTM F739.
See Quick Tips #191: Chemical-Resistant Gloves Guide for more information on selecting a chemical-resistant glove.
See Quick Tips #306: Safety Glove Size Chart for assistance with glove sizing.
Commonly Asked Questions
Find even more information you can use to help make informed decisions about the regulatory issues you face in your workplace every day. View all Quick Tips Technical Resources at www.grainger.com/quicktips.
Think Safety. Think Grainger.®
Grainger has the products, services and resources to help keep employees safe and healthy while operating safer facilities. You’ll also find a network of safety resources that help you stay in compliance and protect employees from hazardous situations. Count on Grainger for lockout tagout, fall protection equipment, confined space products, safety signs, personal protective equipment (PPE), emergency response and so much more!
The content in this newsletter is intended for general information purposes only. This publication is not a substitute for review of the applicable government regulations and standards, and should not be construed as legal advice or opinion. Readers with specific compliance questions should refer to the cited regulation or consult with an attorney.
©2015 W.W. Grainger, Inc.